Search Blogs

Showing results for "Kth Smallest Element in BST"

Found 5 results

LeetCode 230: Kth Smallest Element in a BST – Java Recursive Inorder Traversal Solution

IntroductionLeetCode 230 – Kth Smallest Element in a BST is one of the most important Binary Search Tree interview problems.This question is popular because it tests:BST propertiesInorder traversalDFS recursionTree traversal optimizationRecursive state managementUnderstanding this problem properly builds a strong foundation for advanced BST problems.Problem Link🔗 https://leetcode.com/problems/kth-smallest-element-in-a-bst/Problem StatementGiven:Root of a Binary Search TreeInteger kReturn:The kth smallest value in the BSTThe indexing is:1-indexedExample 1Inputroot = [3,1,4,null,2]k = 1Output1ExplanationBST inorder traversal becomes:[1,2,3,4]1st smallest element is:1Example 2Inputroot = [5,3,6,2,4,null,null,1]k = 3Output3Key ObservationThe most important BST property:Inorder Traversal of BST gives sorted orderExample:5/ \3 6/ \2 4/1Inorder traversal:1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6So:kth smallest = kth node in inorder traversalIntuitionWe perform:Left → Root → RightWhile traversing:Keep counting visited nodesWhen count becomes kStore answerNo need to traverse entire tree after finding answer.Brute Force ApproachIdeaStore complete inorder traversal in listReturn:list.get(k - 1)Brute Force Java Solutionclass Solution {public void inorder(TreeNode root, List<Integer> list) {if(root == null) return;inorder(root.left, list);list.add(root.val);inorder(root.right, list);}public int kthSmallest(TreeNode root, int k) {List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>();inorder(root, list);return list.get(k - 1);}}Complexity of Brute ForceTime ComplexityO(N)Space ComplexityO(N)Extra list storage required.Optimized Recursive ApproachIdeaInstead of storing entire traversal:Maintain counterStop when kth node is reachedThis saves unnecessary storage.Java Solutionclass Solution {int coun = 0;int ans = -1;public void inorder(TreeNode root, int k, List<Integer> lis) {if(root == null) return;inorder(root.left, k, lis);coun++;if(coun == k) {ans = root.val;return;}inorder(root.right, k, lis);}public int kthSmallest(TreeNode root, int k) {List<Integer> lis = new ArrayList<>();inorder(root, k, lis);return ans;}}Cleaner Optimized Versionclass Solution {int count = 0;int answer = -1;public void inorder(TreeNode root, int k) {if(root == null) return;inorder(root.left, k);count++;if(count == k) {answer = root.val;return;}inorder(root.right, k);}public int kthSmallest(TreeNode root, int k) {inorder(root, k);return answer;}}Why This WorksBST inorder traversal always visits nodes in:sorted ascending orderSo:1st visited node = smallest2nd visited node = second smallestkth visited node = kth smallestDry RunInputroot = [5,3,6,2,4,null,null,1]k = 3BST Structure5/ \3 6/ \2 4/1Inorder Traversal1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6Counter ProgressNodeCount112233At count = 3:answer = 3Final Output3Iterative Stack ApproachIdeaUse explicit stack instead of recursion.Iterative Java Solutionclass Solution {public int kthSmallest(TreeNode root, int k) {Stack<TreeNode> stack = new Stack<>();while(true) {while(root != null) {stack.push(root);root = root.left;}root = stack.pop();k--;if(k == 0) {return root.val;}root = root.right;}}}Time Complexity AnalysisOptimized RecursiveTime ComplexityO(H + k)Where:H = tree heightWe visit only required nodesWorst case:O(N)Space ComplexityO(H)Recursive stack space.Iterative ComplexityTime ComplexityO(H + k)Space ComplexityO(H)Stack space.Follow-Up OptimizationProblem Follow-UpWhat if BST changes frequently?Example:Insert operationsDelete operationsFrequent kth smallest queriesAdvanced OptimizationStore:size of subtreeinside every node.This allows:O(log N)kth smallest queries.This concept is used in:Order Statistic TreesAugmented BSTsIndexed TreesInterview ExplanationIn interviews, explain:Inorder traversal of a BST gives nodes in sorted order. Therefore, the kth visited node during inorder traversal is the kth smallest element.This demonstrates:BST understandingDFS recursionTree traversal masteryOptimization thinkingCommon Mistakes1. Forgetting BST PropertyThis solution works because BST inorder traversal is sorted.Not true for normal binary trees.2. Using Extra Array UnnecessarilyOptimized approach avoids storing entire traversal.3. Incorrect Counter PlacementCounter must increase:AFTER left traversalBEFORE right traversal4. Forgetting Early ReturnOnce kth element is found:answer should be stored immediatelyFAQsQ1. Why does inorder traversal work?Because BST inorder traversal produces sorted order.Q2. Can this be solved iteratively?Yes.Using stack-based inorder traversal.Q3. Why is BST important here?Without BST ordering property:kth smallest cannot be determined using inorderQ4. Is this frequently asked?Yes.It is one of the most common BST interview questions.ConclusionLeetCode 230 is an excellent BST problem for mastering:Inorder traversalBST propertiesDFS recursionStack traversalTree optimizationThe core insight is:Inorder traversal of a BST always produces sorted order.Once this concept becomes intuitive, many BST interview problems become much easier.

LeetCodeKth Smallest Element in BSTBinary Search TreeJavaInorder TraversalBSTMedium

LeetCode 450: Delete Node in a BST – Java Optimized Recursive Solution with Dry Run

IntroductionThe Delete Node in a BST problem is one of the most important Binary Search Tree interview questions because it combines:BST traversalTree restructuringRecursive thinkingNode replacement logicTree manipulationUnlike searching or insertion, deletion is slightly more complex because we must maintain BST properties after removing a node.This problem is frequently asked in coding interviews and online assessments.Problem Link🔗 LeetCode 450 – Delete Node in a BSTProblem StatementGiven:The root of a Binary Search TreeA key valueDelete the node containing the key while preserving BST properties.Return the updated BST root.BST Property ReminderIn a Binary Search Tree:Left subtree -> smaller valuesRight subtree -> greater valuesAfter deletion:Tree must still remain a valid BST.Example 1Inputroot = [5,3,6,2,4,null,7]key = 3Output[5,4,6,2,null,null,7]VisualizationBefore deletion: 5 / \ 3 6 / \ \ 2 4 7After deleting 3: 5 / \ 4 6 / \ 2 7Key Deletion CasesBST deletion has 3 important cases.Case 1: Node Has No ChildSimply remove the node.Case 2: Node Has One ChildReplace the node with its child.Case 3: Node Has Two ChildrenThis is the tricky part.We:Find inorder predecessor or successorReplace nodeReconnect subtrees properlyIntuitionSuppose we want to delete:3from: 5 / \ 3 6 / \ 2 4Since node 3 has:Left childRight childwe cannot directly delete it.Instead:Attach right subtree to rightmost node of left subtreeReturn left subtree as replacementThis preserves BST ordering.Brute Force ApproachIdeaStore inorder traversalRemove target nodeRebuild BSTWhy Brute Force is BadProblems:Extra memory usageRebuilding tree is expensiveUnnecessary traversalBrute Force ComplexityTime ComplexityO(N)Space ComplexityO(N)Optimized BST Deletion ApproachUse BST properties to:Search efficientlyModify only required nodesPreserve tree structureJava Solutionclass Solution { public TreeNode deleteNode(TreeNode root, int key) { if(root == null) return root; if(root.val == key) return solve(root); TreeNode originalRoot = root; while(root != null) { if(root.val > key) { if(root.left != null && root.left.val == key) { root.left = solve(root.left); } else { root = root.left; } } else { if(root.right != null && root.right.val == key) { root.right = solve(root.right); } else { root = root.right; } } } return originalRoot; } public TreeNode solve(TreeNode root) { if(root.left == null) return root.right; if(root.right == null) return root.left; TreeNode rightChild = root.right; TreeNode leftChild = asright(root.left); leftChild.right = rightChild; return root.left; } public TreeNode asright(TreeNode root) { if(root.right == null) return root; return asright(root.right); }}How This Solution WorksThe main logic happens inside:solve(root)This function deletes the node safely.Understanding solve()Case 1If:root.left == nullreturn right subtree.Case 2If:root.right == nullreturn left subtree.Case 3If both children exist:Save right subtreeFind rightmost node in left subtreeAttach right subtree thereReturn left subtreeWhy Rightmost Node?Because:Rightmost node of left subtreeis the:largest node smaller than rootThis maintains BST ordering perfectly.Dry RunInput 5 / \ 3 6 / \ \ 2 4 7key = 3Step 1Search node:3Step 2Node has:Left child = 2Right child = 4Step 3Find rightmost node in left subtree.Rightmost node:2Step 4Attach right subtree:2.right = 4Step 5Return left subtree:2Updated BST becomes valid.Time Complexity AnalysisBest CaseO(log N)Balanced BST.Worst CaseO(N)Skewed BST.Space ComplexityRecursive HelperO(H)where:H = tree heightAlternative Recursive ApproachAnother common method:Replace node with inorder successorDelete successor recursivelyThis approach is also interview friendly.Interview ExplanationIn interviews explain:When deleting a node with two children, we preserve BST properties by connecting the right subtree to the rightmost node of the left subtree.This demonstrates:BST restructuring knowledgeTree manipulation skillsRecursive reasoningPointer managementCommon Mistakes1. Forgetting BST PropertyDeletion should not break ordering.2. Losing SubtreesAlways reconnect children carefully.3. Incorrect Node ReplacementMany candidates replace node incorrectly.4. Not Handling Null CasesAlways check:root == nullproperly.FAQsQ1. Why is BST deletion difficult?Because tree structure must remain valid after removal.Q2. Why use rightmost node of left subtree?It is the largest smaller value.Perfect replacement candidate.Q3. Can we use inorder successor instead?Yes.Both predecessor and successor approaches work.Q4. What is deletion complexity?Balanced BST:O(log N)Worst case:O(N)Related BST ProblemsPractice these next:Insert into BSTSearch in BSTValidate BSTLowest Common Ancestor in BSTKth Smallest Element in BSTInorder Successor in BSTConclusionDelete Node in BST is one of the most important BST interview problems because it teaches:Tree restructuringRecursive manipulationPointer handlingBST property maintenanceThe key insight is:When deleting a node with two children, reconnect subtrees carefully so BST ordering remains valid.Mastering this problem makes advanced BST operations significantly easier.

BSTJavaBinary Search TreeLeetCodeTreeRecursionMedium

Inorder Successor in BST – Java Optimized BST Solution with Dry Run

IntroductionThe Inorder Successor in BST problem is one of the most important Binary Search Tree interview questions asked in coding interviews and online coding platforms like GeeksforGeeks.This problem tests your understanding of:Binary Search Tree propertiesInorder traversalRecursive searchingTree optimization techniquesSuccessor logic in BSTUnderstanding this problem properly helps in solving many advanced BST questions efficiently.Problem Link🔗 GeeksforGeeks – Inorder Successor in BSTProblem StatementGiven:A Binary Search TreeA reference node kFind the:Inorder Successorof that node.What is Inorder Successor?The inorder successor of a node is:The next greater node in the inorder traversal of the BST.Example 1Inputroot = [2,1,3]k = 2Inorder Traversal1 2 3Output3Example 2Inputroot = [20,8,22,4,12,null,null,null,null,10,14]k = 8Inorder Traversal4 8 10 12 14 20 22Output10Key BST ObservationIn a BST:Left subtree -> smaller valuesRight subtree -> greater valuesThe inorder traversal of BST is always:Sorted orderThis property helps us optimize the search.IntuitionSuppose:k = 8and current node is:20Since:20 > 8this node can potentially be the inorder successor.But there may exist a smaller valid successor in the left subtree.So:Store current node as possible answerMove leftBrute Force ApproachIdeaPerform inorder traversalStore traversal in listFind node kReturn next elementBrute Force Java Solutionclass Solution { List<Integer> inorder = new ArrayList<>(); void traverse(Node root) { if(root == null) return; traverse(root.left); inorder.add(root.data); traverse(root.right); } public int inOrderSuccessor(Node root, Node k) { traverse(root); for(int i = 0; i < inorder.size() - 1; i++) { if(inorder.get(i) == k.data) { return inorder.get(i + 1); } } return -1; }}Brute Force ComplexityTime ComplexityO(N)Space ComplexityO(N)because of traversal list.Optimized BST ApproachInstead of traversing the entire tree:Use BST propertiesReduce unnecessary traversalSearch efficientlyOptimized Java Solutionclass Solution { int c = -1; int solve(Node root, Node x, int c) { if(root == null) return c; if(root.data > x.data) { c = root.data; return solve(root.left, x, c); } else { return solve(root.right, x, c); } } public int inOrderSuccessor(Node root, Node k) { return solve(root, k, c); }}How This Solution WorksWhenever:root.data > k.datathe current node becomes a possible successor candidate.But there may exist a smaller valid successor in the left subtree.So:Store current nodeMove leftWhy Move Right Otherwise?If:root.data <= k.datathen current node cannot be successor.Move right to search for larger values.Dry RunInput 20 / \ 8 22 / \ 4 12 / \ 10 14k = 8Step 1Current node:20Since:20 > 8possible successor:20Move left.Step 2Current node:8Since:8 <= 8Move right.Step 3Current node:12Since:12 > 8update successor:12Move left.Step 4Current node:10Since:10 > 8update successor:10Move left.Step 5Node becomes null.Return:10Final Answer10Alternative Inorder Traversal ApproachAnother common approach:Perform inorder traversalTrack previous nodeWhen previous node becomes k, current node is successorAlternative Recursive Solutionclass Solution { Node prev = null; Node succ = null; void solve(Node root, Node k) { if(root == null || succ != null) return; solve(root.left, k); if(prev != null && prev.data == k.data) { succ = root; } prev = root; solve(root.right, k); } public int inOrderSuccessor(Node root, Node k) { solve(root, k); return succ != null ? succ.data : -1; }}Time Complexity AnalysisOptimized BST SolutionBest CaseO(log N)Balanced BST.Worst CaseO(N)Skewed BST.Space ComplexityRecursive StackO(H)where:H = height of treeInterview ExplanationIn interviews explain:Whenever we encounter a node greater than k, it becomes a possible inorder successor candidate. Then we move left to search for a smaller valid successor.This demonstrates:BST optimization understandingRecursive traversal logicEfficient searching skillsCommon Mistakes1. Traversing Entire Tree UnnecessarilyBST property already reduces search space.2. Returning First Greater NodeNeed the:smallest greater nodenot any greater node.3. Forgetting Candidate UpdateAlways update candidate before moving left.4. Confusing Floor/Ceil LogicSuccessor logic is different from:FloorCeilPredecessorFAQsQ1. What is inorder successor?The next greater node in inorder traversal.Q2. Why BST helps optimization?BST ordering allows skipping unnecessary branches.Q3. Can inorder successor be absent?Yes.If node is largest element, answer is:-1Q4. Can this be solved iteratively?Yes.Iterative solution is also common in interviews.Related BST ProblemsPractice these next:Search in BSTCeil in BSTFloor in BSTValidate BSTLowest Common Ancestor in BSTKth Smallest Element in BSTConclusionInorder Successor in BST is a very important interview problem because it teaches:BST optimizationRecursive searchingSuccessor logicTree traversal efficiencyThe key idea is:Whenever a node is greater than k, it becomes a possible successor candidate, but a smaller valid successor may still exist in the left subtree.Mastering this logic makes advanced BST problems significantly easier.

BSTGFGTreeBinary Search TreeJavaTree TraversalRecursionEasy

Ceil in BST – Java Recursive Binary Search Tree Solution with Dry Run

IntroductionThe Ceil in BST problem is one of the most important Binary Search Tree interview questions.This problem teaches:BST traversalRecursive searchingDecision making using BST propertiesTree optimizationInterview-level recursion conceptsThe main challenge is understanding how BST ordering helps us efficiently locate the smallest value greater than or equal to a target number.Problem Link🔗 GeeksforGeeks – Ceil in BSTProblem StatementGiven a Binary Search Tree and an integer:xfind the:Ceil(x)The ceil of a number is:The smallest value in the BST that is greater than or equal to x.If no such value exists:return -1Example 1Inputroot = [5,1,7,N,2,N,N,N,3]x = 3Output3ExplanationSince:3 exists in the BSTthe ceil is:3Example 2Inputroot = [10,5,11,4,7,N,N,N,N,N,8]x = 6Output7ExplanationThe smallest value greater than or equal to:6is:7Key ObservationBinary Search Trees follow:Left subtree -> smaller valuesRight subtree -> greater valuesThis allows efficient searching.IntuitionSuppose:x = 6and current node is:10Since:10 > 6this node can potentially be the answer.But maybe a smaller valid ceil exists in the left subtree.So:Store current node as possible answerMove leftImportant BST LogicIf:root.data == xWe found exact ceil.Return immediately.If:root.data > xCurrent node can be ceil.Move left to find smaller possible ceil.If:root.data < xCurrent node cannot be ceil.Move right.Brute Force ApproachIdeaTraverse the entire BST:Store all values greater than or equal to xReturn minimum among themBrute Force ComplexityTime ComplexityO(N)Space ComplexityO(N)If storing elements.Optimized BST Recursive ApproachUsing BST properties:Ignore unnecessary branchesSearch intelligentlyReduce traversal workJava Solutionclass Solution { int c = -1; int solve(Node root, int x, int c) { if(root == null) return c; if(root.data == x) return root.data; if(root.data > x) { c = root.data; return solve(root.left, x, c); } else { return solve(root.right, x, c); } } int findCeil(Node root, int x) { return solve(root, x, c); }}How the Solution WorksThe recursion maintains:current best ceil candidateWhenever:root.data > xupdate ceil candidate.Then search left subtree for smaller valid answer.Dry RunInput 10 / \ 5 11 / \ 4 7 \ 8x = 6Step 1Current node:10Since:10 > 6Possible ceil:10Move left.Step 2Current node:5Since:5 < 6Move right.Step 3Current node:7Since:7 > 6Update ceil:7Move left.Step 4Left child is null.Return:7Final Answer7Optimized Iterative ApproachYou can also solve this iteratively.Iterative Java Solutionclass Solution { int findCeil(Node root, int x) { int ceil = -1; while(root != null) { if(root.data == x) { return root.data; } if(root.data > x) { ceil = root.data; root = root.left; } else { root = root.right; } } return ceil; }}Why Iterative is BetterIterative solution avoids recursion stack.Better for:Large treesMemory optimizationInterview follow-up questionsTime Complexity AnalysisBest CaseO(log N)Balanced BST.Worst CaseO(N)Skewed BST.Space ComplexityRecursiveO(H)Recursion stack.IterativeO(1)Extra space.Interview ExplanationIn interviews explain:Since BST maintains sorted ordering, we can intelligently move left or right. Whenever a node is greater than x, it becomes a potential ceil candidate.This demonstrates:BST understandingRecursive reasoningSearch optimizationEfficient traversal logicCommon Mistakes1. Traversing Entire TreeUnnecessary because BST already provides ordering.2. Not Updating Ceil ProperlyAlways update:ceil = root.databefore moving left.3. Returning First Greater ElementNeed the:smallest greater valuenot just any greater value.4. Ignoring Exact MatchIf:root.data == xreturn immediately.FAQsQ1. What is ceil in BST?Smallest value greater than or equal to x.Q2. Why move left after finding larger value?To search for a smaller valid ceil.Q3. Can this be solved iteratively?Yes.Iterative solution is highly optimized.Q4. What if ceil does not exist?Return:-1Related BST ProblemsPractice these next:Search in BSTInsert into BSTKth Smallest in BSTLowest Common Ancestor in BSTConclusionCeil in BST is an excellent problem for learning:BST traversalRecursive decision makingSearch optimizationInterview tree logicThe key insight is:Whenever a node is greater than x, it becomes a potential answer, but a smaller valid ceil may still exist in the left subtree.Mastering this concept makes many BST interview problems significantly easier.

Binary Search TreeBSTJavaRecursionGFGMedium

LeetCode 98: Validate Binary Search Tree – Java DFS Recursive Solution Explained

IntroductionLeetCode 98 – Validate Binary Search Tree is one of the most important Binary Search Tree interview problems.This question is extremely popular because it tests:BST propertiesRecursive tree traversalDFS recursionRange validationTree constraints handlingMany beginners make mistakes on this problem because checking only parent-child relationships is not enough.Understanding the correct BST validation logic is very important for interviews.Problem Link🔗 https://leetcode.com/problems/validate-binary-search-tree/Problem StatementGiven the root of a binary tree, determine whether it is a valid Binary Search Tree (BST).A valid BST follows:Left subtree contains only smaller valuesRight subtree contains only greater valuesBoth left and right subtrees must also be BSTsExample 1Inputroot = [2,1,3]OutputtrueExplanation 2 / \ 1 3All BST conditions are satisfied.Example 2Inputroot = [5,1,4,null,null,3,6]OutputfalseWhy False? 5 / \ 1 4 / \ 3 6Although:4 < 6the node:4exists inside the right subtree of:5and should therefore be greater than 5.This violates BST rules.Key InsightThe most important understanding:Every node must satisfy an entire valid range, not just parent comparison.This is where many incorrect solutions fail.Common Wrong ThinkingMany beginners try:if(root.left.val < root.val && root.right.val > root.val)This is incorrect.Because BST validation depends on:ALL ancestor constraintsnot just immediate parent.Correct IntuitionEach node has:Minimum allowed valueMaximum allowed valueFor example:Left subtree -> values smaller than rootRight subtree -> values greater than rootAs recursion goes deeper:constraints become tighterVisual Understanding 10 / \ 5 15 / \ 6 20Node:6is invalid because:6 < 10even though:6 < 15This proves:Parent-only checking is insufficient.Brute Force ApproachIdeaFor every node:Find maximum in left subtreeFind minimum in right subtreeValidate BST conditionsBrute Force ComplexityTime ComplexityO(N²)Because subtree traversal repeats for every node.Space ComplexityO(H)Recursive stack space.Optimized Recursive DFS ApproachThe optimized idea:Pass valid range during recursion.Each node must satisfy:min < node.val < maxJava Solutionclass Solution { public boolean solve(TreeNode root, long min, long max) { if(root == null) return true; if(root.val <= min || root.val >= max) { return false; } return solve(root.left, min, root.val) && solve(root.right, root.val, max); } public boolean isValidBST(TreeNode root) { if(root == null) return true; return solve(root, Long.MIN_VALUE, Long.MAX_VALUE); }}Why Use Long Instead of Int?Constraints allow:-2³¹ <= Node.val <= 2³¹ - 1Using:Integer.MIN_VALUEInteger.MAX_VALUEcan create edge-case failures.So we safely use:Long.MIN_VALUELong.MAX_VALUEHow This WorksFor every node:Left SubtreeAllowed range:(min, root.val)Right SubtreeAllowed range:(root.val, max)This guarantees global BST validity.Dry RunInputroot = [2,1,3]Step 1Current node:2Allowed range:(-∞, +∞)Valid.Step 2Move left:1Allowed range:(-∞, 2)Valid.Step 3Move right:3Allowed range:(2, +∞)Valid.Final OutputtrueAnother Dry RunInputroot = [5,1,4,null,null,3,6]Step 1Node:5Range:(-∞, +∞)Valid.Step 2Move right to:4Range:(5, +∞)Now:4 <= 5Invalid BST.Final OutputfalseTime Complexity AnalysisTime ComplexityO(N)Every node visited once.Space ComplexityO(H)Where:H = height of treeWorst case:O(N)for skewed tree.Alternative Approach Using Inorder TraversalKey PropertyBST inorder traversal produces:strictly increasing orderInorder Java Solutionclass Solution { TreeNode prev = null; public boolean inorder(TreeNode root) { if(root == null) return true; if(!inorder(root.left)) return false; if(prev != null && root.val <= prev.val) { return false; } prev = root; return inorder(root.right); } public boolean isValidBST(TreeNode root) { return inorder(root); }}Interview ExplanationIn interviews, explain:A valid BST requires every node to satisfy ancestor constraints, not just parent constraints. Therefore, we recursively maintain valid minimum and maximum bounds for each node.This demonstrates:Deep BST understandingRecursive DFS masteryConstraint propagationEdge-case handlingCommon Mistakes1. Comparing Only Parent NodesIncorrect approach:root.left.val < root.valThis misses ancestor violations.2. Forgetting Strict InequalityBST requires:strictly smallerstrictly greaterDuplicates are invalid.3. Using int Instead of longCan fail on edge values.Always use:long minlong max4. Incorrect Range PassingCorrect recursion:left -> (min, root.val)right -> (root.val, max)FAQsQ1. Why does parent comparison fail?Because BST validity depends on all ancestor constraints.Q2. Why use min/max bounds?Bounds propagate BST restrictions correctly.Q3. Can inorder traversal solve this?Yes.BST inorder traversal must be strictly increasing.Q4. Is this asked frequently?Very frequently.It is one of the most important BST interview questions.Related ProblemsPractice these next:Search in BSTInsert into BSTLowest Common Ancestor in BSTKth Smallest Element in BSTConclusionLeetCode 98 is an excellent problem for mastering:BST validationRecursive DFSConstraint propagationTree traversalInterview problem-solvingThe key insight is:Every BST node must satisfy a valid global range, not just local parent conditions.Once this concept becomes intuitive, many advanced BST problems become significantly easier.

LeetCodeBinary Search TreeBSTJavaDFS TraversalBinary TreeRecursionMedium