Search Blogs

Showing results for "Digit Extraction"

Found 6 results

LeetCode 2553: Separate the Digits in an Array – Java Solution Explained (2 Easy Approaches)

IntroductionIn coding interviews and competitive programming, many problems test how well you can manipulate numbers and arrays together. One such beginner-friendly problem is LeetCode 2553 – Separate the Digits in an Array.In this problem, we are given an integer array, and we need to separate every digit of every number while maintaining the original order.This problem is excellent for practicing:Array traversalDigit extractionReverse processingArrayList usage in JavaThinking about order preservationProblem Link🔗 ProblemLeetCode 2553: Separate the Digits in an ArrayProblem StatementGiven an array of positive integers nums, return an array containing all digits of each integer in the same order they appear.ExampleInput:nums = [13,25,83,77]Output:[1,3,2,5,8,3,7,7]IntuitionThe main challenge is:Extract digits from each numberPreserve the original left-to-right orderNormally, extracting digits using % 10 gives digits in reverse order.Example:83 → 3 → 8So we need a way to restore the correct order.Approach 1 – Using String ConversionIdeaConvert every number into a string and then traverse each character.This is the simplest and most beginner-friendly approach.AlgorithmTraverse every number in the array.Convert the number into a string.Traverse each character of the string.Convert character back to integer.Store digits into ArrayList.Convert ArrayList to array.Java Code – String Approachclass Solution { public int[] separateDigits(int[] nums) { ArrayList<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>(); for (int num : nums) { String str = String.valueOf(num); for (char ch : str.toCharArray()) { list.add(ch - '0'); } } int[] ans = new int[list.size()]; for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) { ans[i] = list.get(i); } return ans; }}Dry Run (String Approach)Input:nums = [13,25]Step 113 → "13"Digits added:1, 3Step 225 → "25"Digits added:2, 5Final Array:[1,3,2,5]Time Complexity & Space ComplexityTime ComplexityO(N × D)Where:N = number of elementsD = number of digitsSpace ComplexityO(N × D)For storing digits.Approach 2 – Mathematical Digit Extraction (Optimal Without String)This is the approach you implemented in your code.Instead of converting numbers into strings, we extract digits mathematically using:digit = num % 10num = num / 10But digits come in reverse order.To fix this:Traverse the original array from back to frontStore extracted digitsReverse the final resultThis avoids string conversion completely.Intuition Behind Reverse TraversalSuppose:nums = [13,25]If we traverse from the end:25 → 5,213 → 3,1Stored list:[5,2,3,1]Now reverse the list:[1,3,2,5]Correct answer achieved.Java Code – Mathematical Approachclass Solution { public int[] separateDigits(int[] nums) { ArrayList<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>(); for (int i = nums.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (nums[i] < 10) { list.add(nums[i]); } else { int val = nums[i]; while (val != 0) { int digit = val % 10; val = val / 10; list.add(digit); } } } int[] ans = new int[list.size()]; int k = 0; for (int i = list.size() - 1; i >= 0; i--) { ans[k++] = list.get(i); } return ans; }}Dry Run (Mathematical Approach)Input:nums = [13,25,83]Traverse from Back83Digits extracted:3, 8List:[3,8]25Digits extracted:5,2List:[3,8,5,2]13Digits extracted:3,1List:[3,8,5,2,3,1]Reverse Final List[1,3,2,5,8,3]Correct answer.Time Complexity Analysis & Space ComplexityTime ComplexityO(N × D)Because every digit is processed once.Space ComplexityO(N × D)For storing final digits.Which Approach is Better?ApproachAdvantagesDisadvantagesString ConversionEasy to understandUses extra string conversionMathematical ExtractionBetter DSA practiceSlightly harder logicInterview PerspectiveIn interviews:Beginners should first explain the string approach.Then discuss optimization using mathematical extraction.Interviewers like when candidates:Understand digit manipulationThink about order preservationCompare multiple approachesCommon Mistakes1. Forgetting Reverse OrderUsing % 10 extracts digits backward.Example:123 → 3,2,1You must reverse later.2. Not Handling Single Digit NumbersSingle digit numbers should directly be added.3. Character Conversion MistakeWrong:list.add(ch);Correct:list.add(ch - '0');Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)Q1. Why do digits come in reverse order?Because % 10 always extracts the last digit first.Example:123 % 10 = 3Q2. Can we solve this without ArrayList?Yes, but ArrayList makes dynamic storage easier.Q3. Which approach is more optimal?Both have similar complexity.Mathematical extraction avoids string conversion and is preferred in interviews.Q4. Is this problem important for interviews?Yes. It teaches:Number manipulationOrder handlingArray traversalBasic optimization thinkingConclusionLeetCode 2553 is a simple yet valuable beginner problem for understanding:Digit extractionArray handlingReverse traversalOrder preservationYou learned two approaches:String Conversion ApproachMathematical Digit Extraction ApproachThe mathematical solution is especially useful because it strengthens core DSA concepts and improves problem-solving skills for interviews.If you're preparing for coding interviews in Java, this is a great problem to master before moving to harder digit manipulation questions.

ArrayEasyLeetcodeDigit ExtractionJava

LeetCode 258 — Add Digits | Brute Force to O(1) Digital Root Trick Explained in Java

IntroductionSome problems on LeetCode look too simple to teach you anything meaningful. LeetCode 258 — Add Digits is one of those problems that tricks you with its simplicity. The simulation is beginner-friendly and easy to code in five minutes, but hiding right underneath the surface is a beautiful piece of number theory that lets you solve the entire thing in a single arithmetic expression — no loops, no recursion, pure O(1) math.Whether you are just starting your DSA journey or preparing for coding interviews, this problem is worth understanding deeply. Not just for the answer, but for the mathematical intuition that produces it. By the end of this article, you will not just know the formula — you will understand exactly why it works, where it comes from, and how to derive it yourself even if you forget it during an interview.Problem LinkLeetCode 258 — Add Digits https://leetcode.com/problems/add-digits/Problem StatementGiven an integer num, repeatedly add all its digits until the result has only one digit, and return it.The follow-up asks: can you solve this in O(1) time without any loop or recursion?Approach 1 — Simulation (The Intuitive Way)IntuitionThe problem statement itself tells you exactly what to do. Keep summing the digits of the number until you are left with a single digit. You simulate this literally using nested loops.To extract digits from any integer, two operations do all the work:num % 10 isolates the rightmost digit. For 38, that gives 8.num / 10 removes the rightmost digit. For 38, that leaves 3.You accumulate the digits into a sum, replace num with that sum, and repeat the whole process until num drops below 10.Dry Runnum = 38Outer loop iteration 1:38 % 10 = 8 → sum = 8, num = 33 % 10 = 3 → sum = 11, num = 0Inner loop ends. num = 11Outer loop iteration 2:11 % 10 = 1 → sum = 1, num = 11 % 10 = 1 → sum = 2, num = 0Inner loop ends. num = 2num < 10 → outer loop exits → return 2 ✅Codeclass Solution { public int addDigits(int num) { // If already a single digit, return immediately — no work needed if (num < 10) return num; // Keep repeating the digit sum process until num becomes single digit while (num >= 10) { int sum = 0; // Extract each digit from right to left using modulo and division while (num > 0) { int dig = num % 10; // isolate the last digit num = num / 10; // strip the last digit off sum = sum + dig; // accumulate into running sum } // Replace num with the sum of its digits and check again num = sum; } return num; }}ComplexityTime Complexity: O(log n) — Each iteration reduces the number to the sum of its digits, shrinking it dramatically. The number of passes is very small even for large inputs.Space Complexity: O(1) — Only a handful of integer variables. No extra memory allocated.This passes all test cases cleanly. But the follow-up challenges you to eliminate the loop entirely. That is where things get genuinely interesting.Approach 2 — O(1) Digital Root Formula (The Mathematical Way)Starting With ObservationBefore jumping to the formula, let us build the intuition from scratch the way a mathematician would — by looking at small cases and hunting for a pattern.Let us compute the result for every number from 0 to 27 manually:num → result0 → 01 → 12 → 23 → 34 → 45 → 56 → 67 → 78 → 89 → 910 → 1 (1+0)11 → 2 (1+1)12 → 3 (1+2)13 → 4 (1+3)14 → 5 (1+4)15 → 6 (1+5)16 → 7 (1+6)17 → 8 (1+7)18 → 9 (1+8)19 → 1 (1+9=10, then 1+0=1)20 → 2 (2+0)21 → 3 (2+1)22 → 4 (2+2)23 → 5 (2+3)24 → 6 (2+4)25 → 7 (2+5)26 → 8 (2+6)27 → 9 (2+7)The pattern is impossible to miss. After 0, the results cycle through 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and then repeat, endlessly, with a period of exactly 9.Now the question is — why? Why does the digit sum cycle with period 9? To understand that, we need to talk about what happens to a number modulo 9.The Core Mathematical Property — Why Digits and Modulo 9 Are ConnectedHere is the fundamental theorem that powers this entire solution:Any positive integer is congruent to the sum of its digits modulo 9.In plain English: if you take a number, divide it by 9, and note the remainder — that remainder is the same as the remainder you get when you divide the sum of its digits by 9.Let us prove this properly so it actually makes sense rather than just being a thing you memorize.Take any two-digit number. You can write it as:num = 10a + bWhere a is the tens digit and b is the units digit. For example, 38 = 10(3) + 8.Now notice that 10 = 9 + 1, so:num = (9 + 1)a + b = 9a + a + bWhen you compute num % 9:num % 9 = (9a + a + b) % 9 = (9a % 9) + (a + b) % 9 = 0 + (a + b) % 9 = (a + b) % 9And a + b is exactly the digit sum. So num % 9 = digitSum % 9. They share the same remainder modulo 9.This same logic extends to three-digit numbers. Write num = 100a + 10b + c. Since 100 = 99 + 1 and 10 = 9 + 1:num = (99 + 1)a + (9 + 1)b + c = 99a + 9b + a + b + cWhen you take % 9, the 99a and 9b parts vanish because they are divisible by 9, and you are left with (a + b + c) % 9 — which is again just the digit sum modulo 9.This pattern holds for numbers of any length. Every power of 10 is just 1 more than a multiple of 9 — 10 = 9+1, 100 = 99+1, 1000 = 999+1 — so all the place-value multipliers disappear modulo 9, leaving only the digit sum behind.This is the reason the digit sum process produces the same final result as the original number modulo 9. The digit sum operation preserves the residue modulo 9 at every step.Why the Cycle Has Period 9Now that we know num ≡ digitSum (mod 9), the cycling pattern makes total sense.Every time you apply the digit sum operation, the result changes but the residue modulo 9 stays the same. You keep applying it until you hit a single digit. The single-digit numbers are 0 through 9. Among those, the residue modulo 9 of each single digit is just the digit itself — except 9, whose residue is 0.So the final single digit you land on is determined entirely by what num % 9 is:num % 9 == 0 → result is 9 (for any positive num)num % 9 == 1 → result is 1num % 9 == 2 → result is 2...num % 9 == 8 → result is 8The only exception is num = 0 itself, which is a genuine zero, not a nine.Translating This Into a FormulaIf we tried to write this directly as num % 9, there is one problem: multiples of 9 like 9, 18, 27 give a remainder of 0, but the correct answer for all of them is 9, not 0.We need a formula that maps every positive integer to a value in 1..9 cyclically, rather than 0..8.The standard trick for shifting a zero-indexed cycle to a one-indexed cycle is to subtract 1 before taking the modulo and add 1 after:result = 1 + (num - 1) % 9Let us verify this on a few cases:num = 9: 1 + (9-1) % 9 = 1 + 8 % 9 = 1 + 8 = 9 ✅num = 18: 1 + (18-1) % 9 = 1 + 17 % 9 = 1 + 8 = 9 ✅num = 1: 1 + (1-1) % 9 = 1 + 0 = 1 ✅num = 10: 1 + (10-1) % 9 = 1 + 9 % 9 = 1 + 0 = 1 ✅num = 38: 1 + (38-1) % 9 = 1 + 37 % 9 = 1 + 1 = 2 ✅The only number this formula does not cover is num = 0, which is a special case handled separately since 0 has no digit sum cycle — it simply returns 0.Connecting It Back to the ObservationNow look at the table we built earlier through the lens of this formula. Numbers 1 through 9 map to themselves. Then 10 gives 1 + 0 = 1, same as 1. Numbers 10 through 18 are just 1 through 9 offset by 9. Then 19 wraps back to 1. The cycle length of 9 follows directly from the modulo-9 arithmetic. It is not a coincidence at all — it is the inevitable consequence of how place-value and modular arithmetic interact.Codeclass Solution { public int addDigits(int num) { // Special case: 0 is not part of the 1-9 cycle, it simply returns 0 if (num == 0) return 0; // Digital root formula derived from the congruence property modulo 9. // (num - 1) % 9 maps the range to 0..8 instead of the raw 0..8 cycle // that would make multiples of 9 return 0 incorrectly. // Adding 1 at the end shifts it back to the correct 1..9 range. return 1 + (num - 1) % 9; }}ComplexityTime Complexity: O(1) — A fixed number of arithmetic operations regardless of the size of num.Space Complexity: O(1) — No variables, no data structures, nothing allocated.Approach ComparisonApproachTimeSpaceLoop / RecursionSimulationO(log n)O(1)YesDigital Root FormulaO(1)O(1)NoBoth approaches are entirely correct and both pass all test cases. The simulation is more readable and immediately obvious to anyone reading the code. The digital root formula is what an interviewer is hoping you know when they ask the follow-up — and more importantly, if you understand the modulo-9 proof above, you can derive it on the spot rather than hoping you remembered it.Key TakeawaysThe most important thing this problem teaches you is not the formula itself. It is the habit of asking a deeper question when you see a repeated process: is there a closed-form mathematical pattern hiding inside this repetition?The digit sum operation looks like pure computation at first glance. But underneath it is modular arithmetic, and modular arithmetic has structure that can often be collapsed into a direct formula. That same insight — that repeated digit operations connect to modulo 9 — shows up in divisibility rules you learned in school. A number is divisible by 9 if and only if its digit sum is divisible by 9. A number is divisible by 3 if and only if its digit sum is divisible by 3. Both of those rules are the exact same theorem we used to derive the digital root formula here.Once you internalize this connection between digit sums and modulo 9, you will recognize it surfacing in other problems across number theory, checksum algorithms, and competitive programming. The formula is a one-liner. The understanding behind it is something you carry with you permanently.

Digital RootLeetCode EasyJavaNumber TheoryMath

Understanding HashMap and Hashing Techniques: A Complete Guide

What is HashMap?HashMap is a non-linear data structure that lives inside Java's collection framework, alongside other structures like Trees and Graphs (see the generated image above). What makes it special? It uses a clever technique called hashing to store and retrieve data at blazing speeds.Think of hashing as a smart address system. It converts large keys (like long strings or big numbers) into smaller values that work as array indices. This simple trick transforms your data lookup from slow O(n)O(n) or O(log⁡n)O(logn) operations into lightning-fast O(1)O(1) access times!Understanding Hashing MappingsBefore diving deeper, let's understand the four types of hashing mappings:One-to-one mapping — Each key maps to exactly one indexMany-to-one mapping — Multiple keys can map to the same indexOne-to-many mapping — One key maps to multiple indicesMany-to-many mapping — Multiple keys map to multiple indicesHashMap primarily uses one-to-one and many-to-one mapping strategies to achieve its performance goals.The Problem: Why Not Just Use Arrays?Let's say you want to store 7 elements with keys: 1, 5, 23, 57, 234, 678, and 1000.Using direct indexing (where key = array index), you'd need an array of size 1000 just to store 7 items! That leaves 993 empty slots wasting precious memory. Imagine having a parking lot with 1000 spaces for just 7 cars — totally inefficient!This is the exact problem hash functions solve.Hash Functions: The SolutionA hash function takes your key and calculates which array index to use. The beauty? You can now store those same 7 elements in an array of just size 10!The most common hash function uses the modulus operator:hash(key)=keymod array sizehash(key)=keymodarray sizeExample: With array size = 10:Key 57 → Index: 57mod 10=757mod10=7Key 234 → Index: 234mod 10=4234mod10=4Key 1000 → Index: 1000mod 10=01000mod10=0Now you only need an array of size 10 instead of 1000. Problem solved!Three Popular Hash Function TypesModulus MethodThe most widely used technique. Divide the key by array size (or a prime number) and use the remainder as the index.index=keymod sizeindex=keymodsizeMid Square MethodSquare the key value, then extract the middle digits to form your hash value.Example: Key = 57 → 572=3249572=3249 → Extract middle digits "24"Folding HashingDivide the key into equal parts, add them together, then apply modulus.Example: Key = 123456Split into: 12, 34, 56Sum: 12+34+56=10212+34+56=102Apply modulus: 102mod 10=2102mod10=2The Collision ProblemHere's the catch: sometimes two different keys produce the same index. This is called a collision.Example:Key 27 → 27mod 10=727mod10=7Key 57 → 57mod 10=757mod10=7Both keys want index 7! We need smart strategies to handle this.Collision Resolution: Two Main TechniquesTechnique 1: Open Chaining (Separate Chaining)Mapping Type: Many-to-oneWhen a collision happens, create a linked list at that index and store all colliding values in sorted order.Example: Keys 22 and 32 both map to index 2:Index 2: [22] → [32] → nullAdvantage: Simple and works well in practiceDrawback: If too many collisions occur, the linked list becomes long and searching degrades to O(n)O(n). However, Java's collection framework uses highly optimized hash functions that achieve amortized O(1)O(1) time complexity.Technique 2: Closed Addressing (Open Addressing)Mapping Type: One-to-manyInstead of creating a list, find another empty slot in the array. There are three approaches:Linear ProbingWhen collision occurs, check the next index. If it's occupied, keep checking the next one until you find an empty slot.Hash Function:h(x)=xmod sizeh(x)=xmodsizeOn Collision:h(x)=(h(x)+i)mod sizeh(x)=(h(x)+i)modsizewhere i=0,1,2,3,…i=0,1,2,3,…Example: Keys 22 and 32 both map to index 2:Store 22 at index 2Try 32 at index 2 → occupiedCheck index 3 → empty, store 32 thereProblems:Clustering: Keys bunch together in adjacent indices, slowing down searchesDeleted Slot Problem: When you delete a key, it creates an empty slot that breaks the search chainThe Deleted Slot Problem Explained:Keys 22 and 32 are at indices 2 and 3Delete key 22 from index 2Now when searching for key 32, the algorithm reaches index 2 (empty), thinks key 32 doesn't exist, and stops searching!Solution: Mark deleted slots with a special marker (like -1) or perform rehashing after deletions.Quadratic ProbingSame concept as linear probing, but instead of checking consecutive slots, jump in quadratic increments: 1, 4, 9, 16, 25...Hash Function:h(x)=xmod sizeh(x)=xmodsizeOn Collision:h(x)=(h(x)+i2)mod sizeh(x)=(h(x)+i2)modsizewhere i=0,1,2,3,…i=0,1,2,3,…Advantage: Significantly reduces clusteringDrawback: Still suffers from the deleted slot problemDouble HashingThe most sophisticated approach! Uses two different hash functions to create unique probe sequences for each key.First Hash Function:h1(x)=xmod sizeh1(x)=xmodsizeSecond Hash Function:h2(x)=prime−(xmod prime)h2(x)=prime−(xmodprime)On Collision:h(x)=(h1(x)+i×h2(x))mod sizeh(x)=(h1(x)+i×h2(x))modsizewhere i=0,1,2,3,…i=0,1,2,3,…Advantage: Effectively avoids clustering and provides the best performance among probing techniquesLoad Factor: The Performance IndicatorThe load factor tells you how full your hash table is:Load Factor=Number of elementsArray sizeLoad Factor=Array sizeNumber of elementsPerformance GuidelinesLoad Factor ≤ 0.5 → Good performance, fast operations Load Factor > 0.7 → Poor performance, time to rehash ExamplesBad Load Factor:Array size = 10, Elements = 8Load Factor = 8/10=0.88/10=0.8Action: Rehash the array (typically double the size)Good Load Factor:Array size = 200, Elements = 100Load Factor = 100/200=0.5100/200=0.5Action: No changes needed, performing optimallyWhat is Rehashing?When the load factor exceeds the threshold (usually 0.7), the hash table is resized — typically doubled in size. All existing elements are then rehashed and redistributed into the new larger array. This maintains optimal performance as your data grows.Performance SummaryHashMap delivers exceptional average-case performance:Insertion: O(1)O(1)Deletion: O(1)O(1)Search: O(1)O(1)However, in the worst case (many collisions with poor hash functions), operations can degrade to O(n)O(n).The key to maintaining O(1)O(1) performance:Use a good hash functionChoose an appropriate collision resolution strategyMonitor and maintain a healthy load factorRehash when necessaryConclusionHashMap is one of the most powerful and frequently used data structures in programming. By understanding hashing techniques, collision resolution strategies, and load factors, you can write more efficient code and make better design decisions.Whether you're building a cache, implementing a frequency counter, or solving complex algorithm problems, HashMap is your go-to tool for fast data access!

hashmapdata-structureshashingjavaalgorithmscollision-resolutiontime-complexity

LeetCode 3783 Mirror Distance of an Integer | Java Solution Explained

IntroductionSome problems test complex algorithms, while others focus on fundamental concepts done right.LeetCode 3783 – Mirror Distance of an Integer falls into the second category.This problem is simple yet important because it builds understanding of:Digit manipulationReversing numbersMathematical operationsIn this article, we’ll break down the problem in a clean and intuitive way, along with an optimized Java solution.🔗 Problem LinkLeetCode: Mirror Distance of an IntegerProblem StatementYou are given an integer n.The mirror distance is defined as:| n - reverse(n) |Where:reverse(n) = number formed by reversing digits of n|x| = absolute value👉 Return the mirror distance.ExamplesExample 1Input:n = 25Output:27Explanation:reverse(25) = 52|25 - 52| = 27Example 2Input:n = 10Output:9Explanation:reverse(10) = 1|10 - 1| = 9Example 3Input:n = 7Output:0Key InsightThe problem consists of two simple steps:1. Reverse the number2. Take absolute differenceIntuitionLet’s take an example:n = 120Step 1: Reverse digits120 → 021 → 21👉 Leading zeros are ignored automatically.Step 2: Compute difference|120 - 21| = 99ApproachStep-by-StepExtract digits using % 10Build reversed numberUse Math.abs() for final resultJava Codeclass Solution { // Function to reverse a number public int reverse(int k) { int rev = 0; while (k != 0) { int dig = k % 10; // get last digit k = k / 10; // remove last digit rev = rev * 10 + dig; // build reversed number } return rev; } public int mirrorDistance(int n) { // Calculate mirror distance return Math.abs(n - reverse(n)); }}Dry RunInput:n = 25Execution:Reverse → 52Difference → |25 - 52| = 27Complexity AnalysisTime ComplexityReversing number → O(d)(d = number of digits)👉 Overall: O(log n)Space Complexity👉 O(1) (no extra space used)Why This WorksDigit extraction ensures correct reversalLeading zeros automatically removedAbsolute difference ensures positive resultEdge Cases to ConsiderSingle digit → result = 0Numbers ending with zero (e.g., 10 → 1)Large numbers (up to 10⁹)Key TakeawaysSimple math problems can test core logicDigit manipulation is a must-know skillAlways handle leading zeros carefullyUse built-in functions like Math.abs() effectivelyReal-World RelevanceConcepts used here are helpful in:Number transformationsPalindrome problemsReverse integer problemsMathematical algorithmsConclusionThe Mirror Distance of an Integer problem is a great example of combining basic operations to form a meaningful solution.While simple, it reinforces important programming fundamentals that are widely used in more complex problems.Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)1. What happens to leading zeros in reverse?They are automatically removed when stored as an integer.2. Can this be solved using strings?Yes, but integer-based approach is more efficient.3. What is the best approach?Using arithmetic operations (% and /) is optimal.

EasyArrayReverse NumberLeetCodeJava

LeetCode 3761 Minimum Absolute Distance Between Mirror Pairs | Java HashMap Solution

IntroductionSome problems look simple at first—but hide a clever trick inside.LeetCode 3761 – Minimum Absolute Distance Between Mirror Pairs is one such problem. It combines:Number manipulation (digit reversal)HashingEfficient searchingIf approached naively, this problem can easily lead to O(n²) time complexity—which is not feasible for large inputs.In this article, we will walk through:Problem intuitionNaive approach (and why it fails)Optimized HashMap solutionStep-by-step explanationClean Java code with comments🔗 Problem LinkLeetCode: Minimum Absolute Distance Between Mirror PairsTo gain a deeper understanding of the problem, it is highly recommended that you review this similar problem Closest Equal Element Queries here is the link of the article. Both cases follow a nearly identical pattern, and studying the initial example will provide valuable context for the current task.Problem StatementYou are given an integer array nums.A mirror pair (i, j) satisfies:0 ≤ i < j < nums.lengthreverse(nums[i]) == nums[j]👉 Your task is to find:The minimum absolute distance between such pairsIf no mirror pair exists, return -1.ExamplesExample 1Input:nums = [12, 21, 45, 33, 54]Output:1Explanation:(0,1) → reverse(12) = 21 → distance = 1(2,4) → reverse(45) = 54 → distance = 2✔ Minimum = 1Example 2Input:nums = [120, 21]Output:1Example 3Input:nums = [21, 120]Output:-1Key InsightThe core idea is:Instead of checking every pair,store reversed values and match on the fly.❌ Naive Approach (Brute Force)IdeaCheck all pairs (i, j)Reverse nums[i]Compare with nums[j]ComplexityTime: O(n²) ❌Space: O(1)ProblemWith n ≤ 100000, this approach will definitely cause TLE.✅ Optimized Approach (HashMap)IntuitionWhile iterating through the array:Reverse the current numberCheck if this number was already seen as a reversed valueIf yes → we found a mirror pairKey TrickInstead of storing original numbers:👉 Store reversed values as keysThis allows instant lookup.Java Code (With Detailed Comments)import java.util.*;class Solution {// Function to reverse digits of a numberpublic int reverse(int m) {int rev = 0;while (m != 0) {int dig = m % 10; // extract last digitm = m / 10; // remove last digitrev = rev * 10 + dig; // build reversed number}return rev;}public int minMirrorPairDistance(int[] nums) {// Map to store reversed values and their indicesHashMap<Integer, Integer> mp = new HashMap<>();int min = Integer.MAX_VALUE;for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {// Check if current number exists in map// Meaning: some previous number had reverse equal to thisif (mp.containsKey(nums[i])) {// Calculate distanceint prevIndex = mp.get(nums[i]);min = Math.min(min, Math.abs(i - prevIndex));}// Reverse current numberint revVal = reverse(nums[i]);// Store reversed value with indexmp.put(revVal, i);}// If no pair found, return -1return min == Integer.MAX_VALUE ? -1 : min;}}Step-by-Step Dry RunInput:nums = [12, 21, 45, 33, 54]Execution:IndexValueReverseMap CheckAction01221not foundstore (21 → 0)12112founddistance = 124554not foundstore (54 → 2)33333not foundstore (33 → 3)45445founddistance = 2👉 Minimum = 1Complexity AnalysisTime ComplexityReversing number → O(digits) ≈ O(log n)Loop → O(n)👉 Overall: O(n)Space ComplexityHashMap stores at most n elements👉 O(n)Why This Approach WorksAvoids unnecessary pair comparisonsUses hashing for constant-time lookupProcesses array in a single passKey TakeawaysAlways think of hashing when matching conditions existReversing numbers can convert the problem into a lookup problemAvoid brute force when constraints are largeThis is a classic “store & check” patternCommon Interview PatternThis problem is similar to:Two Sum (hashing)Reverse pairsMatching transformationsConclusionThe Minimum Absolute Distance Between Mirror Pairs problem is a great example of how a simple optimization (using a HashMap) can reduce complexity from O(n²) → O(n).Understanding this pattern will help you solve many similar problems involving:TransformationsMatching conditionsEfficient lookupsFrequently Asked Questions (FAQs)1. Why store reversed value instead of original?Because we want to quickly check if a number matches the reverse of a previous number.2. What if multiple same reversed values exist?The map stores the latest index, ensuring minimum distance is considered.3. Can this be solved without HashMap?Yes, but it will result in inefficient O(n²) time.

LeetCodeArrayJavaMediumHashMap

LeetCode 844: Backspace String Compare — Java Solution With All Approaches Explained

IntroductionLeetCode 844 Backspace String Compare is a fantastic problem that shows up frequently in coding interviews. It combines string manipulation, stack simulation, and even has a follow-up that challenges you to solve it in O(1) space — which is what separates a good candidate from a great one.Here is the Link of Question -: LeetCode 844In this article we cover a plain English explanation, real life analogy, 3 Java approaches including the O(1) space two pointer solution, dry runs, complexity analysis, common mistakes, and FAQs.What Is the Problem Really Asking?You are given two strings s and t. Both contain lowercase letters and # characters. Think of # as the backspace key on your keyboard — it deletes the character just before it. If there is nothing to delete, it does nothing.Process both strings through these backspace operations and check if the resulting strings are equal. Return true if equal, false otherwise.Quick Example:s = "ab#c" → # deletes b → becomes "ac"t = "ad#c" → # deletes d → becomes "ac"Both equal "ac" → return true ✅Real Life Analogy — The Keyboard TypoYou are typing a message. You type "ab", realize you made a typo, hit backspace, and type "c". Your friend types "ad", hits backspace, and types "c". Even though you both typed differently, the final message on screen is the same — "ac".That is exactly what this problem is about. Two people typing differently but ending up with the same result.Approach 1: StringBuilder as Stack (Optimal & Clean) ✅The IdeaThis is your own solution and the best O(n) approach. Process each string independently using a StringBuilder as a stack:Letter → append to StringBuilder (push)# → delete last character if StringBuilder is not empty (pop)Then simply compare the two resulting StringBuilders.public boolean backspaceCompare(String s, String t) { return process(s).equals(process(t));}private String process(String str) { StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); for (int i = 0; i < str.length(); i++) { char c = str.charAt(i); if (c == '#') { if (sb.length() > 0) { sb.deleteCharAt(sb.length() - 1); } } else { sb.append(c); } } return sb.toString();}Notice how extracting a process() helper method makes the code cleaner and avoids repeating the same loop twice — a great habit to show in interviews!Dry Run — s = "ab##", t = "c#d#"Processing s = "ab##":a → append → "a"b → append → "ab"# → delete last → "a"# → delete last → ""Processing t = "c#d#":c → append → "c"# → delete last → ""d → append → "d"# → delete last → ""Both result in "" → return true ✅Time Complexity: O(n + m) — where n and m are lengths of s and t Space Complexity: O(n + m) — two StringBuilders storing processed stringsApproach 2: Stack Based Solution (Interview Classic)The IdeaSame logic as above but using explicit Stack<Character> objects. Great for explaining your thought process clearly in an interview even though StringBuilder is cleaner.public boolean backspaceCompare(String s, String t) { return processStack(s).equals(processStack(t));}private String processStack(String str) { Stack<Character> st = new Stack<>(); for (int i = 0; i < str.length(); i++) { char c = str.charAt(i); if (c == '#') { if (!st.empty()) { st.pop(); } } else { st.push(c); } } StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); while (!st.empty()) { sb.append(st.pop()); } return sb.reverse().toString();}Dry Run — s = "a#c", t = "b"Processing s = "a#c":a → push → stack: [a]# → pop → stack: []c → push → stack: [c]Result: "c"Processing t = "b":b → push → stack: [b]Result: "b""c" does not equal "b" → return false ✅Time Complexity: O(n + m) Space Complexity: O(n + m)Approach 3: Two Pointer — O(1) Space (Follow-Up Solution) 🔥This is the follow-up the problem asks about — can you solve it in O(n) time and O(1) space? This means no extra StringBuilder or Stack allowed.The IdeaInstead of building processed strings, traverse both strings from right to left simultaneously. Keep a count of pending backspaces. Skip characters that would be deleted and compare characters that survive.Why right to left? Because # affects characters to its left, so processing from the end lets us know upfront how many characters to skip.public boolean backspaceCompare(String s, String t) { int i = s.length() - 1; int j = t.length() - 1; int skipS = 0, skipT = 0; while (i >= 0 || j >= 0) { // Find next valid character in s while (i >= 0) { if (s.charAt(i) == '#') { skipS++; i--; } else if (skipS > 0) { skipS--; i--; } else { break; } } // Find next valid character in t while (j >= 0) { if (t.charAt(j) == '#') { skipT++; j--; } else if (skipT > 0) { skipT--; j--; } else { break; } } // Compare the valid characters if (i >= 0 && j >= 0) { if (s.charAt(i) != t.charAt(j)) { return false; } } else if (i >= 0 || j >= 0) { return false; // one string still has chars, other doesn't } i--; j--; } return true;}Dry Run — s = "ab#c", t = "ad#c"Starting from the right end of both strings:Round 1:s[3] = 'c' → valid, no skips → stopt[3] = 'c' → valid, no skips → stopCompare 'c' == 'c' ✅ → move both pointers leftRound 2:s[2] = '#' → skipS = 1, move lefts[1] = 'b' → skipS > 0, skipS = 0, move lefts[0] = 'a' → valid, stopt[2] = '#' → skipT = 1, move leftt[1] = 'd' → skipT > 0, skipT = 0, move leftt[0] = 'a' → valid, stopCompare 'a' == 'a' ✅ → move both pointers leftBoth pointers exhausted → return true ✅Time Complexity: O(n + m) — each character visited at most once Space Complexity: O(1) — only pointer and counter variables, no extra storage!Approach ComparisonThe StringBuilder approach is the easiest to write and explain. The Stack approach is slightly more verbose but shows clear intent. The Two Pointer approach is the hardest to code but the most impressive — it solves the follow-up and uses zero extra space.In an interview, start with the StringBuilder solution, explain it clearly, then mention the Two Pointer approach as the O(1) space optimization if asked.How This Fits the Stack Simulation PatternYou have now seen this same pattern across four problems:3174 Clear Digits — digit deletes closest left non-digit 2390 Removing Stars — star deletes closest left non-star 1047 Remove Adjacent Duplicates — character cancels matching top of stack 844 Backspace String Compare — # deletes closest left character, then compare two stringsAll four use the same StringBuilder-as-stack core. The only differences are the trigger character and what you do with the result. This is the power of pattern recognition in DSA.Common Mistakes to AvoidNot handling backspace on empty string When # appears but the StringBuilder is already empty, do nothing. Always guard with sb.length() > 0 before calling deleteCharAt. The problem explicitly states backspace on empty text keeps it empty.Using Stack and forgetting to handle # when stack is empty In the Stack approach, only pop if the stack is not empty. Pushing # onto the stack when it is empty is a common bug that gives wrong answers.In Two Pointer, comparing before both pointers find valid characters Make sure both inner while loops fully complete before comparing. Comparing too early is the most common mistake in the O(1) space solution.FAQs — People Also AskQ1. What is the best approach for LeetCode 844 in Java? For most interviews, the StringBuilder approach is the best — clean, readable, and O(n) time. If the interviewer asks for O(1) space, switch to the Two Pointer approach traversing from right to left.Q2. How does the O(1) space solution work for LeetCode 844? It uses two pointers starting from the end of both strings, keeping a skip counter to track pending backspaces. Characters that would be deleted are skipped, and only surviving characters are compared.Q3. What is the time complexity of LeetCode 844? All three approaches run in O(n + m) time where n and m are the lengths of the two strings. The Two Pointer approach achieves this with O(1) space instead of O(n + m).Q4. Why traverse from right to left in the Two Pointer approach? Because # affects characters to its left. Scanning from the right lets you know upfront how many characters to skip before you reach them, avoiding the need to store anything.Q5. Is LeetCode 844 asked in Google interviews? Yes, it is commonly used as a warmup or screening problem. The follow-up O(1) space solution is what makes it interesting for senior-level interviews.Similar LeetCode Problems to Practice Next1047. Remove All Adjacent Duplicates In String — Easy — same stack pattern2390. Removing Stars From a String — Medium — star as backspace3174. Clear Digits — Easy — digit as backspace1209. Remove All Adjacent Duplicates in String II — Medium — k adjacent duplicates678. Valid Parenthesis String — Medium — stack with wildcardsConclusionLeetCode 844 Backspace String Compare is a well-rounded problem that tests string manipulation, stack simulation, and space optimization all in one. The StringBuilder solution is your go-to for interviews. But always be ready to explain the Two Pointer O(1) space follow-up — that is what shows real depth of understanding.Check out these problems alongside 1047, 2390, and 3174 and you will have the entire stack simulation pattern locked down for any coding interview.

StringStackTwo PointerString Builder